Aeon AI Risk Management

Evidence you can inspect.

Aeon separates what can be stated publicly today from what remains confidential, client-specific, or under coordinated security triage.

Questions this page answers

What proof can Aeon share publicly?
Aeon can share firm credentials, anonymized engagement examples, authorized research principles, coordinated disclosure channels, and the evidence outputs clients receive.
What does Aeon avoid claiming publicly?
Aeon does not claim public CVEs, bounty payments, certifications, or named unpatched vendors unless an independent public source confirms them.

Credentials

AIGP, CISA, CRISC, and FRM credentials applied to AI implementation, private AI, cybersecurity, governance, risk, and board evidence.

Authorized research

Aeon's owned-lab, AI-driven, human-reviewed pipeline found 101 authorization vulnerabilities across 60 open-source AI and infrastructure projects, including 4 Critical and 32 High findings. Four coordinated disclosure records are public and patched, including two assigned CVEs.

Access Execute Leak

The research pipeline maps to CyberGuard buyer risk: authorization and tenant boundaries, MCP and tool command boundaries, and data-path, SSRF, PII, secret, or retrieval exposure.

Proof taxonomy

Aeon distinguishes identified, independently validated, submitted, vendor-confirmed, public-advisory, and remediation-accepted stages so finding counts and public advisories are never treated as interchangeable claims.

Evidence outputs

Decision packs, remediation evidence, control maps, board summaries, customer diligence evidence, and regulatory readiness roadmaps.

Public boundaries

Aeon reports vulnerabilities, while independent CVE Numbering Authorities assign CVE identifiers. Private, unpublished, and unpatched records remain excluded. An awarded bounty is not described as paid while receipt remains pending.