Aeon AI Risk Management
Evidence you can inspect.
Aeon separates what can be stated publicly today from what remains confidential, client-specific, or under coordinated security triage.
Questions this page answers
- What proof can Aeon share publicly?
- Aeon can share firm credentials, anonymized engagement examples, authorized research principles, coordinated disclosure channels, and the evidence outputs clients receive.
- What does Aeon avoid claiming publicly?
- Aeon does not claim public CVEs, bounty payments, certifications, or named unpatched vendors unless an independent public source confirms them.
Credentials
AIGP, CISA, CRISC, and FRM credentials applied to AI implementation, private AI, cybersecurity, governance, risk, and board evidence.
Access Execute Leak
The research pipeline maps to CyberGuard buyer risk: authorization and tenant boundaries, MCP and tool command boundaries, and data-path, SSRF, PII, secret, or retrieval exposure.
Proof taxonomy
Aeon distinguishes identified, independently validated, submitted, vendor-confirmed, public-advisory, and remediation-accepted stages so finding counts and public advisories are never treated as interchangeable claims.
Evidence outputs
Decision packs, remediation evidence, control maps, board summaries, customer diligence evidence, and regulatory readiness roadmaps.
Public boundaries
Aeon reports vulnerabilities, while independent CVE Numbering Authorities assign CVE identifiers. Private, unpublished, and unpatched records remain excluded. An awarded bounty is not described as paid while receipt remains pending.